Unsurprisingly though the roots of this incident come back to something all too common. Something we regularly see or hear about when it comes to “Gun Deaths”.
"I can’t say that a couple of drunks got into a big fight and somebody got stabbed, because we’re not really sure," said Madison. "We know that it was present, we know it was consumed, we just don’t know how much."
So we have alcohol being a factor, witness claim one was quite intoxicated but the other was sober and hadn’t been drinking. No matter how hard you try, no matter how many laws you pass, you will not stop people from doing stupid things and exercising poor judgment.
You can ban and outlaw “X” but people will either resort to other means, or obtain the items outside the law. All it actually serves to do is prevent those who do exercise good judgment and those who would use the tool properly from using “X”.
Outlawing concealed carry doesn’t stop those who exercise bad judgment from carrying. Just the same, outlawing firearms doesn’t actually stop people from doing stupid things. What it does do is stop those who do not exercise bad judgment from being able to carry an effective tool for self-defense. Banning knives stops people who carry them for their utility, it doesn’t stop someone from using it in poor judgment or in violation of the law to commit assault or murder. Someone who is willing to commit murder gives no extra thought to the legalities of the tools.
The War on Nouns is doomed to failure. The war on Alcohol failed miserably and proved that prohibition of any kind was impossible to enforce. Prohibitions on any noun never benefit the law abiding, quite far from it. The enforcement of the prohibition as well as the actions of the criminal enterprises place the law abiding in the middle. The reasonable and law abiding suffer from these choices and it provides no actual benefit to their situation or safety. In the end, the side effects of the cure end up being considerably worse than the disease.