Now, with his comments about taking away the incentives for success and people losing interest in working hard in mind. Lets look at another video:
Think about this for a second. They’re penalizing success and there are large groups of people who instead of working live off of entitlements from the government. As RobertaX said, we cannot reverse the slope, but we can at least change it to give us some time. Given time we might be able to reverse it.
There is no way a company is going to bother paying for benefits for an intern, doubly so since usually they are on school or their parents healthcare. So now when you’re working 40 hour weeks in the summer they’ll have to provide care of face a fine. Well instead they’ll limit you to 29 hour work weeks.
This is significant because during the summer I regularly worked 40+ hour weeks to pull overtime to save up for my upcoming semesters. Now instead students will have to incur more debt because they will be prevented from earning money to pay for school. Wait, who is it that subsidizes most of the loans, which are exempt from most laws governing debt, that’s right the government.
That’s right folks, the government passed legislation that will force more people to take loans and pay them interest. Nice huh? Don’t worry though, they’re from the government and they’re here to help…
Ultimately though Bill Whittle nails it with this one:
The money quote:
The left has these same failed ideas from about a 20 year window at the end of the 19th century. That have never worked, don’t work now, and will never work. And this clinging to an ossified discredited model based on envy and resentment has killed no less than 100 million people. And many people call this progressive as they cover themselves in glory, but not in the blood or the failure.
It may be the recent history of the 20th century, however I think it’s certainly in the current path of the future for the United States.
Both the University of Idaho and Washington State University forbid concealed carry on campus. Luckily the ban at WSU doesn’t have any teeth in that all they can do is ask you to leave at which point if you refuse you’ll be trespassed. Students and faculty though can face administrative punishment however. I do not remember the exact details regarding carry at the University of Idaho.
I bring this up because so often I hear the following phrase, “Why would you need a gun on campus?” Well maybe you live in the dorms or university housing. Maybe you have a night class and will have to walk across campus in the dark. Ultimately though people seem to think that bad things never happen on campus. Reality always has a habit of showing up though.
It’s best that we all remember these things can and do happen. If you can, support Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, the fight is a significant and real one. I wore an empty holster on to campus on more than one occasion specifically in support. The one debate that I saw occur on campus ended squarely in favor for campus carry.
The thing is, at least with WSU, the board of regents will not move to change the administrative code and the only way you can bring about a legal challenge is if they exercise the code against you. For this reason, many of my friends followed the rule of better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Not everyone is so willing to do that though. Then again, when the building you work in has been attacked by ALF, your desire to survive should they return usually wins.
Though the school would prefer you to be disarmed to be easy prey. It’s not like it’s their life that’s on the line though. It’s like the government and politicians only care about criminals, not the law-abiding.
Not to mention the August incidents that they didn’t bother reporting. Remember these are the “best and brightest” that we send to college. No, I don’t think so anymore. A good majority of those who go to college I think go because they’re too dumb to do anything else.
They go to college racking up debt to get degrees in things that will never earn them enough money to pay it back. Again, remember what I was saying about them not really being the best and brightest. Then you have other incidents where someone claims that College is a right and that everyone should go.
Everyone has the right to attempt to obtain a college education. However just because you can attempt it, doesn’t mean you can afford it or that you will be admitted. It is up to the person to perform well enough to be admitted as well as find a way to finance their schooling. You do not have a right to force someone else to pay for your education. You do nothave a right to be automatically admitted. You merely have a right to seek education, you do not have a right to have it handed to you.
Besides, you know what’s great about the internet, which you can use at your local library, and it’s also cheaper than going to college, you can self educate. There are piles upon piles of information out there if you’re willing to go find it and read it. The MIT Open Courseware is the best example of available information. I have gone through many of the courses trying to improve my knowledge on different subjects as well as supplementing what I already know.
The point of college at this point is to provide a little sheet of paper and certification that you are educated about “X”. The thing is, that certification is an investment and you had better invest wisely. My wife got two degrees, both in the sciences, however it was an actual certification that finally got her a job. All you get out of college now days is a piece of paper, most of them are worthless, a few are gold. If you’re paying for that piece of paper, I suggest making sure it’s gold and not pyrite.
Joe posted an item on Friday which I responded to and felt it worth posting here:
Hey, I was told by an instructor just after I transferred to WSU that I shouldn’t be an Electrical Engineer. Why did he say that? Because my focus wasn’t on regurgitation, it was on RUAC, emphasis on the UAC. Rote memorization is easy, yeah I know Euler’s identity, but understanding it, applying it and correlating it, that’s where the sweet spot of engineering lies. I remember sitting at work looking at a sine wave sampled at a regular interval and realizing that I can get the imaginary component by “rolling back” 90 degrees in time, no math required by the processor, it was already there.
No one ever taught me that, and that instructor who said I shouldn’t be an engineer, I promptly dropped the class and took it the next semester with a different instructor.
Over and over I keep seeing different schools and departments remove classes that actually apply the knowledge and they instead focus on “theory”. I’m sorry but I don’t think universities have any business discussing theory, most push socialism as a working theory, completely ignoring history.
Some have asked why I didn’t go and get my Masters immediately. My response, “they’ve been attempting to brain wash me for the past 20 years of my life, and by god my brain deserves a break from the constant bombardment.” Besides, I make more money overall this way, opportunity cost. Go back piecemeal, one class at a time while working, 4 years I’m done, about the same time I finish my PE apprenticeship, low and be hold my ass is productive and I well be rolling out of debt!
I guess I’m just lucky because my parents didn’t tell me to do what the teacher tells me, they told me “Question Everything!”