[The thread where this went down has pretty much been deep sixed by the other party. He cared so little he took the time to block me. Good thing I have mutual friends to make sure that it never disappears.
Just as a side note, I don’t normally act in a civil manner when I demand something. Please and thank you go right out the window when one makes a “demand”. I was merely asking him to name a victim to prove that he actually could name one, if he didn’t want to then fine, that’s his business.
But overall this has been something that has really started to piss me off as of late. If I voice my displeasure at X for something they said or did that is covered by “Free Speech” I am all the sudden trampling on their free speech by exercising my right to free speech.
[I laughed when I read both of those sentences. First yet another example of a point made by the NRA and fearless leader has turned around to follow it. Again, when I read it I heard exactly this in my head:
I know they will never come out like that and say it, but I can keep wishing right?
Except I don’t really think the NRA is right on this one though. Our Narcissist and Chief hates the First Amendment until it is politically convenient and beneficial for him, otherwise he hates it like he does the second. I am pissed at the NRA because I honestly feel like they threw video games and the First Amendment under the bus.
I grew up on Mario, last I checked I’m not running down the street eating mushrooms and jumping on Goombas.
I played Duck Hunt and have yet to actually go duck hunting or even bird hunting in general.
I played Excitebike and I didn’t go into the extreme sports.
I played Super Off-Road, again I don’t find myself taking my truck into crazy off road courses*.
I played Call of Duty and have yet to feel the urge to run around killing people while dressed as a soldier.
So can someone please explain to me given all the different games I played, note that’s not even all of them, and my countless time spent playing them I somehow didn’t end up screwed up but it’s responsible for screwing up a bunch of other people? Many of those games listed above were controversial at the time and used as a crutch to explain evil deeds done by evil people.
Now supposedly the union isn’t supporting the teacher but I think that’s mainly because it’s obvious how bad the teacher stepped in it in this instance. Moving forward though we have the bus driver who informed a young man that his mother should have aborted him.
Yup, that’s a real civilized respectful disagreement right there. Especially since this man felt he needed to attack a 12 year old child for his families political views. Bummer the bigot couldn’t pick on someone his own size.
But wait, there’s more! This call for respectful disagreement is also coming from the same party who is so tied into the unions they conscript their support from union membership.
How is that for a respectful disagreement? Force support for your party by holding a person hostage by keeping them from feeding themselves or their family by tacking on a fine. Now some may claim that you don’t have to join the union. That only holds true if you’re in a right to work state. You could always go find a job elsewhere that doesn’t have a union, but often the union will do everything to get a monopoly on the industry to force membership.
Moving even further forward, lets do a quick look back into history shall we?
So they did this to themselves, which works well when you can control the narrative and say it was the other side. It fails when you’re minions get caught. Now there was a window that recently broke in Alabama and again the Dems ran off claiming people were shooting at them, mainly the Republicans and independents that can’t have a respectful disagreement. Lets look at what really happened.
However, now there are reports that not only is the robocalling giving out false dates to votes, but an Obama door-to-door campaign targeting seniors in a county that went Republican is also giving out the false dates, I’m not so sure this is an accident.
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three or more times is enemy action. Well bad news for the opposition, I don’t believe in coincidence. Even then the robocalls and door to door mistakes are truly two separate incidents for a count of three. It is well known and common knowledge the date of the election and informing people in mass of a incorrect date, especially in a county likely to vote against you is just wrong, deceitful, and again not an example of someone engaging in a “respectful disagreement”. Yeah, with regards to her use of the word respectful…
Now why would I bring this up, while I am currently doing my best to be respectful to those of differing opinions? Their right to have me remain respectful ends when they’re no longer respectful to me. Even more than that, they have no right to my respect when they are taking my property and work for their own because honestly, where’s the respect in that?
(Emphasis mine.) Think about that for a second. These men unlawfully imprisoned an individual without due process and his only recourse is a civil suit. None of the individuals responsible for this will be held individually accountable. Instead the government taxpayer will pay for their mistake.
State Sponsored Criminal #403: The FBI, Secret Service, and Chesterfield County Police
Because when someone says something you don’t like and you’re in law enforcement, you have a free pass to throw them in jail, laws be damned.
The real outrage in this is that two elected officials threatened the president under color of law for expressing his views. That’s what you should be mad about. I’ll continue my boycott of Chicago and MA.
At which point he goes into a list of places that have been boycotted for their views one way or another. I have to disagree and here's why.
I, like most American's, only become involved when I feel that something affects me. I didn't see the LGBT community come and participate with the Starbucks buycott for example. I'm sure there was overlap as I know that Gay Cynic probably participated but as a whole the groups are not tied together at the hip. I would in general do my best to support someone, but I will not expend energy in going out of my way as I will with places who forbid concealed carry for example.
What has happened here is that a large number of people are supporting Chick-Fil-A, not because of the owners stance on Gay marriage. That is an entirely separate debate and my position can be summed thusly:
The state has no business being involved in marriage. As for the legal rights provided by marriage between partners, who cares if they're both male or female. Everyone deserves the same legal rights and it is no one's business to judge anyone else for their choices.
Moving on though this situation was aggravated by two political individuals. Namely the mayors of Chicago and Boston. These two individuals attempted to use the force of state to punish a company and its owner for voicing their opinion. While I disagree with that opinion, they had every right to say it without the threat or use of force from government. That is the problem, these politicians were using government to silence speech. It wasn't a separate part of the public attempting to shame the company for their opinion, it was the state. The fact that they were using government to influence or control speech is a blatant violation of the first amendment and is worthy of note because what is to stop either of them saying I cannot conduct business because of my outspoken support of the second amendment? It doesn't have to even be about the second amendment though, it could be anything they disagree with.
I am by no means the only one with this view as well. This is very much a free speech issue because the state should not be allowed to disallow businesses from operation based on the opinions and speech of their owners or employees.
I live in Washington and there is no Chick-Fil-A out here. Overall I probably wouldn't go if there was, but given the behavior of a few tyrannical politician's I would give patronage just to show my support. That's exactly what those politicians did by doing that. They drove people to patronize that business merely because the government was intimidating them. -B]
Never mess with cops who are generating revenue or otherwise engaging in tax collectionpenalty collection. For you see in this day in age, and in all honesty, a penalty is really a tax on something other people disagree with.
You know, I tried to change the legislator by the ballot box and soap box. Are you saying I can remove a tyrant by any means necessary?
Seriously this doesn’t surprise me, it’s been the mortis operandi of the left for a very long time. They don’t want a constitutional republic, they want a de facto democracy which they would twist into a dictatorship. You see the law only applies to thee, not to me, in their own eyes. The whole point of the system is that they must act within the law, and that includes only doing things they have the legal power to do.
They cannot just magically change the law to grant them new abilities and powers and it is the role of the Courts to restrain abuse by legislation.
If Representative Gerry Connolly would really like to retire the judicial branch. I’m more than happy to take over the role of providing a check and balance. A word of warning though, in such a case it would define him as a domestic enemy given his willful a wanton disrespect for the Constitution he has sworn to uphold and defend. That clearly defines him as a domestic enemy.
If we take his want and claim as stated lets examine the following. If the legislators can write laws as they see fit, and the courts cannot do anything about it, does that mean that congress could write a law repeating a US internment.? Not only could they, but it would be legal because they could replace the legislators who imprisoned them. Oh wait, how would they be able to vote them out?
Listen here sparky, you might want to shut your mouth, because honestly it’s obvious exactly what you are and what needs to be done with rabid animals like you. It’s just saying so would be considered a threat or some such. I love this country more than anything and you sir are exactly what’s wrong with it. I hope to solve the problem though the Soap and Ballot Box as I am currently trying to do currently. There’s one last box remaining that exists for when all else has failed.
This also ignores the fact that if republicans controlled both house and senate along with the executive branch he would be clamoring how the courts are saving America.
If you’re unaware of the Streisand Effect, please educate yourself before reading further.
This isn’t a full blown drama llama, but we’ll call it a baby drama llama*.
So for those unaware, some idiot lawyer went and demanded money from The Oatmeal because The Oatmeal pointed out in a blog post that his client was stealing copyrighted material. The Oatmeal replied in classic Oatmeal fashion. You can also read a legal synopsis and prediction from the opening shots here.
Then FunkyJunk’s lawyer, a supposed whiz with things related the internet acted surprised at the response. Charles Carreon then continued to flap his wings faster and with such ferocity that a hummingbird would not know how to keep up. Though as of last Friday I figured the weekend would swallow him whole and that would be the end of his 15 minutes of fame caused by his stupidity.
I was wrong. It appears that attempting to shutdown a collection for two non-profits wasn’t enough. He now intents to force them to waste funds in frivolous litigation. There’s a term to describe individuals who do things such as that, I believe it begins with a D and ends with a K.
Seriously, in what world where you commit numerous public relation disasters at the beginning is it a good idea to file lawsuits against two non-profits? It is not a non-profits job to filter who and who does not raise funds on their behalf. If I say I’m raising money for Soldiers’ Angels, that is me telling you where I’m sending the funds, that is not an endorsement by the non-profit.
So Charles Carreon feels it’s a good idea to sue the American Cancer Society and the National Wildlife Federation and then wonders why the internet has reacted the way it has. Well, he’s wondering because he’s a clueless moron that wouldn’t know how the internet actually worked if all it was is two cups with a string in-between.
If Mr. Carreon feels that people are dehumanizing him, maybe it’s because those people don’t feel he’s actually human. I think he’s a giant troll who bullies people and organizations with frivolous litigation without thought for the effect it will have on his fellow man. His only thoughts are focused on how he can get people to stop pointing out how he’s an idiot.
If he hadn’t done anything this whole incident would have faded into obscurity but instead he doubled down on stupid. Heck even after the response from the The Oatmeal just shutting up would have worked in his favor in allowing it to quickly blow over.
So in closing, Charles Carreon, you sir are a giant STD encrusted dick. You’re actions and frivolous threats at the beginning were bad enough. Now though you have proved your dickishness to the world by attacking two charities, one who’s sole goal is to the betterment and health of your fellow man. Yeah, you’re not human, you’re a big fat dick. Thank you for playing.
No I will not take this down because legally this is acceptable under the first amendment much to your dismay and displeasure. I have provided facts and evidence to support my position, you and your legal threats amount to you throwing a tantrum like a 4 year old in a supermarket. Grow up and act your age you spoiled rotten brat. Besides the way to make stuff like this not happen to you is actually quite simple. Don’t be a dick!
*I got pictures of llamas over the weekend and I need to use them so they get into the wild.