via Uncle comes this story.
There were two big developments Monday in the case of a motorist who was shot and killed along Greenwell Springs Road Friday after a fight with a police officer. Investigators say an autopsy shows the deadly bullet was fired by a bystander, not the officer. Police also announced that no charges would be filed in the case, either against the police officer involved or the bystander who fired the fatal shot into the head of George Temple.
The other kicker is the following:
According to Col. Greg Phares, "[Mr. Stevens] orders Mr. Temple to stop and get off the officer. The verbal commands are ignored and Mr. Stevens fires four shots, all of which struck Mr. Temple."
There is also this assessment of the NYPD shooting from the Balloon Goes Up. If you haven’t read it yet, I suggest you do. Of significance is the behavior of Officer 1 versus Officer 2. It gets better though because Joe found something I saw a while ago but couldn’t remember where I found it.
A nationwide study by Kates, the constitutional lawyer and criminologist, found that only 2 percent of civilian shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal. The "error rate" for the police, however, was 11 percent, over five times as high.
Sit back and let that sink and and absorb into your brain. Remember that one of the arguments against concealed carry is that lawful carriers are more likely to shoot innocent bystanders. The problem is the facts do not support this and there is a serious reason why.
Sit back for a second and think about your job, odds are your job provides you extra training from time to time relevant to your specific field. For instance I once or twice a year attend classes specifically on power systems and power protection, paid for by my employer. I am also regularly evaluated on my performance, including my ability to apply skills as well as learn new ones. That said, while I do occasionally study power system material on my free time, that is a rare occurrence. I do often study up on software design, as well as write my own applications. I went into software and EE because I love the subject, so studying it doesn’t really bug me as it’s something I enjoy… That is until I start getting a headache from trying to follow some of the math.
Many officers however carry a gun because it is a part of the job. They attend merely the mandatory training and leave it at that. Luckily for a majority of officers this is not a problem until such time as they require the use of that skill. Officer Doughnut though doesn’t want to spend his own money and off time practicing a skill with something he doesn’t inherently enjoy. There is no incentive for him to do that. Unlike me, where I love to shoot, it is my choice to carry a firearm, and I love learning new skills. I have no problem spending my own money or time on such an endeavor, many within this culture have no problem with that.
We do have a problem with mandatory training requirements because as a wise man once told me, “You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink.” Officers of the law are no exception to this rule. Just because they went into law enforcement doesn’t mean they enjoy firearms.
This closing comment from Ron in his article on the Empire State Building shooting I think drives the point home sufficiently well.
But that is the power of video’s like this! It allows us, with a clear head, to review the actions that occurred and learn from them. If you don’t think about how you are going to respond and just think you will rise the occasion, you are wrong. You will default to your level of training.
The Empire State Building shooting is a chance for us to learn what went wrong and what we need to do better. On both sides of the fence.