No, I will not give up my guns. Now, what are you going to do about it?
If you say you’ll send someone to take them, then you’re admitting to a belief in using pre-emptive state sanctioned violence for political ends. The state can use that same violence against any other group it disagrees with, and you’ve endorsed the concept. Congratulations. You’ve just justified my reason for having guns. You’re also a coward, unwilling to act on your own behalf. You’re only comfortable with contract violence.
If you’re not going to do anything, then you’re just a whining, bleating sheep, and a moral coward I can safely ignore. This results in no harm to you. You have every right to be a bleating sheep. But, the bleating sheep don’t get to herd the sheepdog, and do get eaten by wolves.
So are you a coward or a fascist?
Either way, I am unswayed by your impotent bleating, and choose to ignore it.
[It is amazing the number of people who think that the confiscation of arms will just magically happen. That there will be no violence and everyone will just cooperate peacefully. Not to mention the complete lack of acknowledgement that the state will employ violence against a group of people who have harmed no one.
This is the complete opposite of the American ideal and the character of American’s. The fact that citizens are attacking their fellow citizens who have done nothing wrong idicate just how morally corrupt the opposition has become. Villifying innocent people who want to be able to defend themselves and family for the actions of pure evil.
Michael Z. Williamson puts it quite well. Coward or a fascist, those are their choices. Not a single one of these people would blame all car owners for the actions of a drunk driver. Yet here they are attempting to attribute responsiblity for it. I’m done with the bullshit. -B]