Words fail to express my rage. I shall do as Weer’d said and let it speak for itself.
State Sponsored Criminal #385: The St. Paul Minnesota SWAT Team
Because you need to teach little Timmy and Tiffany to obey their perverted Uncle Sam at an early age, and if you plug their dog and make them lay next to it, the next time Pedo-bear TSA agent molest them they’ll ignore it because they don’t want their new Sparky to take a bullet.
h/t Popehat
It’s been a while since we’ve seen one like this.
A Phoenix police officer has been arrested and could face several felony charges of sexual misconduct with two teenage boys.
…
Garcia said the alleged victims were 14 and 17-year-old Phoenix boys who knowingly entered into a relationship with Wilson. He said Wilson met them through his job as a community outreach officer.
This is one I’m just going to let stand on it’s own.
State Sponsored Criminal #384: Christopher J. Wilson
Because the best way to find underage boys is to work as a cop, you can be trusted then right?
via David N.
Here’s another from RobertaX.
Here’s a question, why was he still employed as a police officer during that time if he was harassing and stalking a woman? I guess the IMPD believes in giving predators every advantage.
State Sponsored Criminal #383: Craig Ratcliff
Because an officer of the law stalking a someone is perfectly acceptable and while we disarm the general public we should leave them with their badge and gun to use against their victim.*
*Note, I don’t like how many of the DV laws work for this reason amongst others. It is too easy to use against someone who is actually innocent and is often used as a tactic to harass someone through the legal system, but the futility is obvious when some how when a cop does it he’s special.
Even less surprising is the fact that the officers also destroyed the surveillance equipment. Tell me, why would an officer do that? My immediate guess is to steal pot without evidence against him for own personal use. There’s only one reason cops destroy surveillance equipment and that is to make sure they’re not recorded when they’re breaking the law.
Overall this is nothing more than state level cronyism when you see the following:
State Sponsored Criminal #381:
Because honest up right cops just don’t like being recorded right? I mean they’re honest so they don’t need to be recorded, they’re just doing their job right?
h/t Uncle
This whole incident is all sorts of fail and can easily be broken down as an officer was quick to resort to his taser without using his brain. Then after screwing the pooch on that front they doubled down on stupid.
State law on the employment of ASL interpreters for deaf suspects is clear.
Basically these officers played the game of CYA and ended up violating more laws because of it. There’s a reason the prosecutor didn’t file charges, no jury in the world would convict. Further she probably saw the civil suit writing on the wall. This ends up in the full count because of the following:
If Tacoma police want to explain their side of the story, we’ll have a follow-up.
There is no doubt that the Tacoma Police will not be punishing the officers involved and will do nothing to mediate or resolve the situation they have created. This is a textbook case of the state sponsoring its own criminals.
State Sponsored Criminal #380: Ryan Koskovich
#381: Michael Young
Because you immediately jump to the taser when you know there is a deaf woman involved. Further, after finding out you tasered an innocent, you charge her with a crime and hold her against the law without an interpreter or informing your supervisor she’s deaf. Because the police don’t have to follow the law, they are the law.
This one’s here merely because of the history of the IMPD in this count already. Namely this, this and this.
I am shocked, shocked I tell you. How is it another anointed individual of the IMPD was able to get behind the wheel of a vehicle while intoxicated. I have been informed numerous times that action is against the law and people keep telling me the law will stop crime and criminals!
At least this individual wasn’t on duty or in a police vehicle. You just have to appreciate the little things he did do.
State Sponsored Criminal #279: Daniel Kepler
Because drinking and driving is only bad when you’re not a member of the Indianapolis Metro Police Department.
h/t RobertaX
So, this is actually a kind of old incident but given new information I feel like classifying it as a state sponsored criminal. Who is this criminal, Major Nidal Hasan, the man animal responsible for the Fort Hood shooting.
Since I’m sure most of you are familiar with the shooting I won’t reiterate details. What is interesting is the following:
Gee, you think it would have been a good idea to interview him there sparky. Tell me why didn’t you interview him given you state the following:
So let me get this straight, you ignored him and let him walk on by because of Political Correctness. Did I understand that right there sparky? Here’s the thing, you guys are more than happy to brew up your own terrorist cells, arm them, and then use the material to scare the public. If you don’t understand what I’m talking about, watch this, I don’t feel like digging up every associate link.
As horrible as this sounds, and it is purely conjecture, what’s to say you all didn’t just look the other way to increase panic and fear, thus causing the American people to want to surrender more freedom and liberty thus giving you more power. Seriously, someone explain to me how this could be allowed to pass purely under the guise of “Political Correctness?”
At best this was negligence, except this had to be willful. People knowingly did nothing and the worst part of it all is the man still hasn’t be tried and many are still claiming this was not an act of terrorism. Evidently the DHS has now released a new requirement that to qualify as a terrorist you must be a white Caucasian male, since you know they run in screaming “Allah Akbar” while shooting at every Christian in the joint.
Seriously, how is it the American public can allow the government and American media to look the other way and play down exactly what happened that day? How is the American people can believe this was anything but an act of terrorism. I know many don’t, but they sit idly by and do nothing while this administration plays the PC game to get this terrorist off the hook. All the while the DHS redefines terrorist’s so broadly myself along with many others fit the description with not a stretch of their definition which doesn’t even relate to the actual definition of terrorist and terrorism. Yet a man who obviously committed an act of terrorism and had ties to known terrorists under the traditional definition was just suffering PTSD. Doesn’t that just seem a little wrong?
The reason this happened is obvious, the state willfully allowed it to happen for political capital. He was a state sponsored terrorist that they allowed to complete his plan to reign terror on American soil. Every person associated with allowing him to walk free should be hung for treason along with him. Someone should have blown the whistle, even if it meant the end of your career. Just because it hurts, doesn’t mean it isn’t the right thing to do.
I hate sounding like a conspiracy theorist, but seriously this is just too damn stupid. The long complicated plot is trying to believe that political correctness allowed this to happen as opposed to people willfully looking the other way in an effort to gain more power.
State Sponsored Criminal and Terrorist 277: Major Nidal Hasan
Because real terrorism isn’t terrorism, it’s the result of PTSD, and all those libertarians that just want the nanny state to leave them the hell alone, they’re the real terrorists.
Yes, you read that right, NOAA, as in the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration.
So what was so horrible a crime that these agents from the government have spent so much time and effort?
Black, 50, a marine biologist who also captains a whale-watching ship, was with some watchers in Monterey Bay in 2005 when a member of her crew whistled at the humpback that had approached her boat, hoping to entice the whale to linger. Back on land, another of her employees called the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to ask if the whistling constituted “harassment” of a marine mammal, which is an “environmental crime.” NOAA requested a video of the episode, which Black sent after editing it slightly to highlight the whistling. NOAA found no harassment — but got her indicted for editing the tape, calling this a “material false statement” to federal investigators, which is a felony under the 1863 False Claims Act, intended to punish suppliers defrauding the government during the Civil War.
See, they knew it wasn’t harassment but well, given 3 felonies a day they can up root your life to dig up anything. When we say dig up, I also mean twisting the facts to make you guilty of crimes you didn’t commit.
If there was ever a clue that something was wrong with our government and legal system, this is a shining example.
State Sponsored Criminal #377: NOAA
Because if you’re an environmentalist wacko, get a job with the feds, then you can destroy anyone who does something you disagree with with the power, weight, and force of government behind you.
via Uncle.
Raw Feed
FeedBurner Feed
Subscribe by Email