Yet another officer looking for women while on the job and then preying upon them.
State Sponsored Criminal #451: Daniel Lavely
Because when you see a cute girl you like, just tell her to get in the back of your patrol car, she’ll listen because you’re a cop.
DeKalb County is back again, their previous incidents are here. I’ve noticed that much of the time bad actions are all within the same area. Take Seattle PD for example. This incident has holy hell written all over it.
What was her grievous offense that provoked a response like that from the officer?
The officer claimed he didn’t know she was pregnant, possible but doubtful, and that she came at him threateningly. The prosecutors dropped charges against the woman. It really is telling though given the following. It ends up though that Jerad Wheeler is the officer from one of the previous incidents in the count.
Considering this officer is too stupid to figure out if he’s at the right address and then threatens the home owner, is it really that surprising that he would kick a pregnant woman? I mean he’s obviously mentally deficient and heaven forbid they actually can someone who love his Authoritah!
If anyone has information on the third complaint mentioned in the article please contact me. Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, three or more times is enemy action. At this point he’s writing checks his ass can’t cash and obviously should not be employed in law enforcement. That just means he’ll be promoted and given more Authoritah.
State Sponsored Criminal Count #333: Jerad Wheeler
Because the scowl of a pregnant woman about to pop is so fearsome it requires physical force. Doubly so if she’s crying since she’s obviously hysterical!
Without even fully assessing the situation they made the determination to use physical force. Now before you say, “Well maybe it was necessary, he was hiding something.”
After finding no weapons or drugs in Jefferson’s car, SPD arrested him for “obstruction.”
So let me get this straight the officers decided before even really making contact with the suspect to execute a use of physical force. They then beat this man after pulling him from his car. After beating him and searching his vehicle and finding nothing they trump a charge to justify the use of force. Then the department comes and puts the icing on the cake.
This coming from the same department that did this little incident!? How in the name of god is that even remotely justifiable. They had no reasonable expectation to require the use of force at all. No orders, no commands, just beat the hell out of the guy and we’ll fix it all in post.
State Sponsored Criminal Count:
190: Officer John Doe*
191: Officer John Doe*
Because in this day in age, go to full contact force first without reason or cause. You can always make up something else later and the Seattle PD will back it up.
*As usual if you get a name please contact me. I don’t care if they’re undercover cops, it’s getting posted.
They’re back already. Between them and Seattle PD I could create a daily feed for just the two of them. For the departments, being listed here is not a good thing. If you’re here repeatedly you might want to reevaluate your behavior. This however leaves no doubt the officers behavior is endorsed.
…
How many things do you have to do blatantly wrong, and illegal I might add, before you are fired for being a bad cop? Continuing in the article the board was sympathetic to the officers because it felt the chaos of the evening provided an valid excuse.
Pardon me, but I don’t give a crap. This isn’t the first time someone from Denver PD got caught lying. Most disturbing is they get back pay as well. They get paid for sitting on their ass that whole time. Your tax dollars at work.
There’s a reason I’m siding against the officers here. The city found enough evidence and grounds to fire the officers. Couple that with the fact that this isn’t Denver’s first rodeo in the count.
Besides here’s the video:
State Sponsored Criminal Count 240: Ricky Nixon
241: Kevin Devine
via David Wilson
Came across a nice article on concealed carry that says yet again what has been said so many times.
Concealed carry could save your life
Every time I read about a school massacre or other shooting by criminals or crazies, when someone mentions giving the right to carry a concealed weapon on or off campus, I wonder why so many oppose this solution….
Spotsylvania
It’s good to know I’m not the only one; especially with all the B.S. in Seattle.
-B
This morning on the radio it was announced that recently there have been hate crimes on the WSU campus. What I heard was “Forced disarmament ensures victims for hate crimes!” Many would look at the geographic location and figure that it’s because we’re “rural” and don’t like people who are different. The fact is though, this is actually pretty far off and one hell of a stereotype. The same crap happened while I was at UW in Seattle. This same stereotype is often used against gun owners. This is even more of a slap since many gun owners view firearms as a line of self defense that EVERYONE has a right to. It is the universal leveler than ANYONE can use to defend themselves.
The fact that the University forces everyone, including those who want and have more need than normal to provide for their own personal defense, to be disarmed is disconcerting.
While I most certainly agree that it is shocking, as well as saddening. The idea that she believed that it couldn’t happen on the WSU campus was her first mistake.
“We are disturbed and saddened by the recent events,” she said. “Of course we want all our students to feel safe, secure and respected.”
What people do not realize is that the biggest reason for concealed carry is not to “shoot” but to provide a deterrent. No attacker wants to end up in the hospital at the hands of his “victim”. Disarmament serves as an illusion of safety and security. However, when you are attacked while disarmed, how can you effectively fight back, especially when outnumbered or over powered? Besides, these people already are breaking the law, what’s to stop them from using weapons? Another disturbing fact however, is the fact that it appears that the attackers are casing their victims by finding them at the GLBTA sponsored events.
“Hogan, a junior French and Spanish major, said he didn’t recognize the man, but the man recognized him from an event sponsored by the GLBTQ community.”
This shows premeditation in their actions and is quite disturbing.
For those at the University of Idaho or at Washington State University that feel affected by this, please feel free to contact the Palouse Pink Pistols, or myself or anyone else. No one has to live in fear, and no one should!
Blanket of ice: U.S. shivers as 49 of 50 states are hit by snow storms
Florida has so far escaped the snow and the Seattle area has seen quite a bit of it (which is quite unusual).
The King County prosecutor has decided not to press charges against Officer Ian Birk regarding this incident.
This whole incident is reminding me of the what the Federal Government did to protect Lon Horiuci after Ruby Ridge. The officer created this incident, and shot a man without any real probable cause. The individual had done nothing wrong, was not aggressive or threatening anyone, yet he was shot four times. The reasoning for the prosecutors office was the following:
Any civilian who made the same decision as Birk would be charged with murder, or at minimum manslaughter. There is no way that they would escape criminal prosecution. Even in video taped incidents of self defense civilians do end up on trial. Why is law enforcement given a free pass? So what that their job is more dangerous, if they use deadly force, it needs to be CLEARLY justified. In this case Seattle PD has admitted that he was clearly unjustified.
So, this is really just the same story we’ve heard before, but now on a lower level than the Federal level. Remember, they’re exempt, you are not.
Raw Feed
FeedBurner Feed
Subscribe by Email