You keep using those words and I don’t think they mean what you think they mean….
It’s amazing the number of people who just shrug this behavior off and claim it as acceptable.
h/t Kevin
You keep using those words and I don’t think they mean what you think they mean….
It’s amazing the number of people who just shrug this behavior off and claim it as acceptable.
h/t Kevin
These officers made an assumption about the condition of an individual. They caused an adrenaline spike that made him coherent enough to be able to request assistance and they continued to ignore him. Upon arrival of paramedics they promptly took him to the hospital because of a severe blood sugar deficiency.
As my father had diabetes this isn’t funny, this isn’t ok, this is down right negligent. The police officers assume without any actual evidence that this individual is a criminal. Except he is the exact opposite. He felt his medical emergency coming on and pulled himself off the road. Below is the officers thank you for his responsible actions.
[Sarcasm]Yup that right there is called positive reinforcement for good behavior.[/Sarcasm]
There is also a serious policy issue given the following:
So policy dictates that in an incident where someone is obviously no longer of a sound mental state, so much so they may loose consciousness, medical aid shouldn’t be sought unless it can be confirmed beyond a reasonable doubt the cause is diabetes? What if the individual dies from alcohol poisoning or a drug overdose? Since when have police officers started receiving medical training to the degree of EMTs, much less doctors and nurses. Their job should be merely to asses the situation and say, “Does this person need attention to verify he is ok?” Mental incoherence is a big, “Get Help Now Idiot!”.
No matter how you cut it though these officers were criminally negligent and exercised unnecessary force because well that’s how cops deal with problems. Instead of using their brain, the just beat the thing until they get it to do what they want.
This isn’t the first instance I’ve heard of something like this happening either. Yeah I hate drunk drivers, more than you can possibly believe, but the legal system exists for a reason. Even more than that, I don’t want someone who has an actual medical emergency getting beat up because someone thinks they’re drunk. There’s simple tests to determine the truth. Cops are paid to protect the public, beating the hell out of a man who was in a medical emergency doesn’t fit the bill.
State Sponsored Criminal #431: Officer John Doe
#432: Officer John Doe
Because when you’re a cop, you’re Judge Dread and can determine someone’s guilt on the spot. You don’t need a blood test, there’s no such thing as a medical emergency so they must be either high or drunk.
Let’s compare and contrast the following two people, what they did, and the reactions by the American Media.
For those who don’t recognize the pictures, on the left we have former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, on the right we have Attorney General Eric Holder.
The significant similarities necessary for this discussion:
Differences:
For those who may not remember the details. Here is the quick rundown of the two big scandals under Holder.
The details you more likely need a reminder of is the incidents involving Alberto Gonzales
So while the comments and behavior of Gonzales was despicable and worthy of question, why has AG Holder been allowed to remain? There is a man responsible for creating programs with the express purpose of illegally undermining a constitutional right. Programs that resulted in the deaths of members of the public. A man who has been found in contempt of congress, yet no one seems to have the balls to actually fire him.
Ultimately the biggest difference between these two is the men who were responsible for appointing them. Because honestly that’s the only reason Eric Holder has been able to continue in his position. Remember that the next time some tells you about how the media isn’t biased.
Why would an officer feel he needed to throw a flash-bang towards a small young child?
Ahh, the war on drugs. Supposedly they felt this to be a high threat raid, except no one bothered to take into account the two small children in the house. Instead they felt it to be a better option to kick down the door, break windows, and emotionally scar them since you know, knocking on the door and serving the warrant would be some how bad.
The real clue is that no charges have been field, the police claim they found evidence, of what who knows. Most likely they will use that “evidence” as leverage to prevent legal action on their negligence.
State Sponsored Criminal #430: The Billings SWAT Team
Because by no means should an officer use his own brain to think whether or not “X” is a good idea or actually required. Even more so, hand the potentially dangerous material to someone too stupid to wait till it goes off before letting it go.
h/t The Wife.
He was arrested though, so why put him on the count? Well he’s an example of why departments drag their feet for the benefit of those who should really be expelled from service.
The TBI began investigating in July at the request of District Attorney General Tommy Thompson.
Obviously the departments involved have the welfare of their citizens in their best interests… right?
State Sponsored Criminal #429: Ray Amalfitano
Because if you get caught breaking the rules, don’t worry, your department won’t fire you, just resign and get a job some place else.
There’s a bunch involved in this one and I am too lazy to go try to count them all up.
Of note for why I have put it in the count.
At least the Sheriff is pouncing and acting instead of just dragging his feet. I applaud him for taking the imitative.
As it was supervisors who also failed to act, this one goes in the count.
State Sponsored Criminal #428: Tony Richards and Company
Because when you’re a prison guard, you can do whatever you want right? Your word is law after all!
(Emphasis mine.) When you see it written like that, it reads as the definition of a State Sponsored Criminal now doesn’t it?
State Sponsored Criminal #427: The Feds
Because if you want to get a crime, just ask the government for permission first. If you have to sweeten the deal by squealing on your compatriots. No honor among thieves you know.
Boy, to get that kind of treatment he must of done something really bad.
Now before you completely dismiss it, note no charges were ever filed against the mother. The charges against the son were merely resisting arrest and disorderly conduct, both of which were dropped. Both of those charges are often referred to as “contempt of cop”. But most note worthy is the following:
Rarely do bad cops ever just do it once. No they’re allowed to continue abusing the citizens till their actions are so egregious that it could cost someone an elected position. The response at that point is to merely let him resign.
State Sponsored Criminal #426: Michael Arco
Because when you see someone sitting in a car in their drive way, throw them on the ground and arrest them. Just make it up as you go along, your partner will always back you up.